|
|
Location |
2008 Rank |
2007 Rank |
1990 Rank |
|
London |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Paris |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
Frankfurt |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Brussels |
4 |
6 |
4 |
|
Barcelona |
5 |
4 |
11 |
|
Amsterdam |
6 |
5 |
5 |
|
Madrid |
7 |
7 |
17 |
|
Berlin |
8 |
8 |
15 |
|
Munich |
9 |
9 |
12 |
|
Zurich |
10 |
13 |
7 |
|
Geneva |
11 |
12 |
8 |
|
Dusseldorf |
12 |
16 |
6 |
|
Milan |
13 |
10 |
9 |
|
Manchester |
14 |
18 |
13 |
|
Dublin |
15 |
11 |
- |
|
Lisbon |
16 |
15 |
16 |
|
Hamburg |
17 |
20 |
14 |
|
Lyon |
18 |
17 |
18 |
|
Prague |
19 |
14 |
23 |
|
Stockholm |
20 |
22 |
19 |
|
Birmingham |
21 |
21 |
- |
|
Budapest |
22 |
23 |
21 |
|
Copenhagen |
23 |
25 |
- |
|
Warsaw |
24 |
19 |
25 |
|
Rome |
25 |
27 |
- |
|
Vienna |
26 |
24 |
20 |
|
Glasgow |
27 |
26 |
10 |
|
Leeds |
28 |
30 |
- |
|
Istanbul |
29 |
- |
- |
|
Helsinki |
30 |
29 |
- |
|
Bucharest |
31 |
28 |
- |
|
Moscow |
32 |
31 |
24 |
|
Oslo |
33 |
32 |
- |
|
Athens |
34 |
33 |
22 |
The most important factors when choosing a location
|
Factor |
2008 % |
% |
|
Availability of qualified staff |
60 |
62 |
|
Easy access to markets, customers or clients |
59 |
58 |
|
The quality of telecommunications |
54 |
55 |
|
Transport links with other cities and internationally |
53 |
52 |
|
Cost of staff |
40 |
36 |
|
The climate governments create for business through tax policies or financial incentives |
27 |
27 |
|
Languages spoken |
27 |
27 |
|
Value for money of office space |
26 |
26 |
|
Ease of travelling around within the city |
25 |
24 |
|
Availability of office space |
24 |
26 |
|
The quality of life for employees |
21 |
21 |
|
Freedom from pollution |
18 |
16 |
In 2008, qualified employees were once again the most important factor in choosing a
location. This was followed in the ranking of the most significant factors by easy access to
markets and customers, quality of telecommunications, good transport links and employee costs.
With the exception of employee costs (here Warsaw was in first place, Bucharest in second place
and Budapest in third place) London, Paris and Frankfurt took the first three places in these
critical categories.
However, one German city took first place in two categories this year: Berlin is the best
European location for office space and is the best city for expatriates.
The city which had made the greatest improvement since last year was Barcelona. Last year,
Madrid was still ahead of the field.
The most important place for expansion within Europe and for the next five years was Moscow. In
terms of expansion outside Europe, Shanghai is high on strategists’ lists of priorities.
Qualified staff Germany’s trump card
“Among the ten European locations with the highest numbers of qualified staff available to
companies, the top five are in Germany”, adds Mr Brühl. “This is a further clear indication
that German is better than its reputation suggests”.
“As in other countries, it appears that little will change in Germany in terms of the
positioning of the major cities in the popularity ranking in the next few years”, states Inga
Schwarz, researcher at C&W Germany. “However, we should not forget that regional centres
throughout Europe are gaining in importance and appeal for larger companies owing to their
cost-conscious business climate and ‘soft factors’ such as quality of living.”
Green Building
This year’s European Cities Monitor also looked at the topic of sustainability for the first
time. 15% of those questioned stated that their company owns or has leased a sustainable
building, 45% do not use a sustainable building but are susceptible to the idea, and 32% do not
use a sustainable building and are not interested in doing so.
For 35% of those questioned, the most important aspects of a green building were reductions in
energy and water consumption whereas 13% stated that lower running costs were the
priority.
11% of all companies regarded the most important factor in opting for “pro green building” as
being the improved travel planning offered by such business locations.
There are currently still many barriers to relocating to green buildings. 19% of all those
questioned stated that the poor availability of sustainable properties is a major impediment,
for 17%, it takes too long for their investments in sustainable buildings to pay off, 16% state
that rents are too high in comparison with standard buildings and 15% are not entirely sure
what the criteria for a sustainable building are.
Free ECM download
The study can be downloaded free of charge from the C&W Knowledge Center at:
http://www.cushmanwakefield.com/cwglobal/jsp/kcLanding.jsp?Country=DE&Language=DE&pageType=null&lhsImgAltKey=null&lhsImg=null
Study Details
The study has been conducted on an annual basis since 1990 and published by C&W.
Employees at the top management levels of the 500 largest European firms were questioned. The
survey was conducted in June and July 2008 by TNS (Taylor Nelson Sofres).
|
|