Sovereign Debt Worries Impact – But Performance Has Still Turned Positive
- Trading volumes hit €25.2bn in Q2, 19% up on the first quarter.
- Core markets again dominated – with
France, Germany
and the UK
accounting for 64% of all trading – but buying demand has spread to new areas, notabl
Norway and
Sweden in Q2.
- Central & Eastern markets have also come back into favour, with volumes rising 61% vs a
16% increase in the West, led by Poland,
Russia and Turkey
in particular.
-
Overseas buyers increased their activity by 26% on the quarter versus a 15% increase in
domestic investment, taking their market share to 38% versus 35% in 2009.
-
Retail slipped back from its market leading levels of Q1, with 30% of trading in Q2 versus
43% for offices. Industrial moved up from 7% to 13% over the quarter.
- Prime retail remains strongly in demand from a growing range of buyers nonetheless and
activity will increase further as yield compression brings more stock on to the market.
- Prime capital values rose 3.7% on the year, the first annual increase since Q2 2008. Their
quarterly increase of 1.8% was the highest since Q2 2007.
- Prime yields averaged 7.1%, a fall of 12bp on the quarter, on a par with Q1, taking the
fall since the market trough to 37bp.
- Occupational markets stabilised significantly, with rents falling just 1.9% on the year and
actually increasing on the quarter (0.4% pa) for the first time since Q3 2008.
- Peak to trough capital values fell by 22% while rental levels fell 9.4%.
- Attractive pricing versus historic averages and other asset classes is expected to keep
investment demand ahead of supply for prime product.
- Interest in non-prime product will steadily improve but following the sovereign debt
crisis, investors will remain wary of increasing their risk tolerance too quickly.
- A modest improvement in supply should support investment activity, with volumes expected to
increase 20-25% in the second half, to hit €105bn for the year overall.
On paper the last quarter saw a further improvement in the European real estate market, with
dealing volumes rising 19%, yield compression continuing, capital value growth accelerating,
better sentiment spreading away from just core countries and occupier markets stabilising
– with prime rents registering their first quarterly increase since Q3 2008.
However, while the period started well, the market hit a bump mid-quarter as the
sovereign debt crisis caused greater uncertainty and a fall in risk appetites. This led to
a stabilisation in property yields and sentiment. At the same time, the still restricted supply
of affordable bank debt was also not supportive of a deeper recovery in demand.
Nonetheless, according to Michael Rhydderch, Head of the Cross Border Team of the EMEA
Capital Markets Group at Cushman & Wakefield, “While the second quarter has blown hot
and cold, we are somewhat more optimistic about the outlook for the second half of the year
given that supply should improve and the attractions of property investment, if anything, are
now greater than they were thanks to the fall in bond yields.”
“The largest and most active part of the market is still made up of low risk investors
focussed on core product in large, liquid markets, but there have been indications recently
that more investors are willing to look towards value-add areas, at least in the most
competitive and demanded markets, the UK and France. However this is set against the background
of an increasingly diverse marketplace, with rental growth, tenant and investor demand and
yield trends all varying by city and by property quality. In particular, investors are keenly
aware of the risk of smaller, more peripheral and less liquid markets following the fall-out in
Greece.”
“Recent events may lead to stronger property investment demand from risk-averse buyers
seeking relatively secure incomes” added Rhydderch, “and there are also signs of
increasing availability, aided by the recent market hiccup, reminding some potential vendors
that a strong ongoing recovery in pricing is not guaranteed. A pick-up in foreclosures is also
slowly starting to feed stock to the market and while banks generally are still under little
pressure to force sales, stress tests and increasing reserve requirements may bring more banks
in to the market after the summer.”
“Yields are likely to take a little longer to compress than we had expected”
concluded Rhydderch. “but the very best assets and markets will see strong demand still
driving yields down – particularly if bond yields remain as low as they are today. For
the average market however, the over-dependence on equity rather than debt should lead to a
more demanding view on the price of risk.”
David Hutchings, Head of European Research at Cushman & Wakefield, added “All in
all, while investor trends have been weaker than hoped, occupier markets are performing
better than most expected, with offices showing the best signs of recovery to date. Office and
industrial property may also benefit from an improving level of corporate demand later this
year but they will still be more driven by supply shortages as Grade A availability reduces.
Quality retail will remain in demand from risk-averse investors but consumer markets are likely
to be subdued in the short term as public sector cut-backs are introduced. Nonetheless, lower
inflation, low interest rates and improving private sector job prospects will help to offset
this.”
Concluding, Hutchings said “We look to be about to lose some momentum in the economic
recovery and public sector consolidation will certainly subdue growth in 2011 – possibly
threatening a renewed downturn in some areas. These cutbacks will also bring opportunities
however, most obviously from the sale of public sector assets. It’s also worth noting
that other than in very strongly public–sector driven cities, performance in most prime
property markets is more a factor of private than public sector growth and hence not only will
public sector cutbacks have less impact than might be expected, the cuts may in fact stimulate
demand in some cases, reducing competition for staff and other resources for example and
reversing the “crowding out” of private sector investment often seen when public
sector spending is running at too high a level.”